A Furnished Cabin: Keep Furniture Out of the Pool Twice

The fictional situation

The fictional STR owner reconciles the seller inventory with separately purchased furniture. The assumed $35,000 is incremental depreciation versus the no-study baseline, not the entire furnishings cost or a promised allocation.

Read the numbers correctly

The example assumes 2,800 square feet, a $2,800 Stratum study fee, and $900 of separately engaged implementation work. It assumes $35,000 of additional depreciation compared with the no-study baseline, a 32% marginal rate, and 100% usability in the modeled period. None of these deduction or implementation inputs is a quote or a completed study result.

Calculate the early-period comparison

Assumed tax reduction = $35,000 × 100% × 32% = $11,200. Combined assumed cost = $2,800 + $900 = $3,700. The arithmetic difference is $7,500. This is an undiscounted early-period comparison; it is not a lifetime return, permanent savings estimate or recommendation.

Change the assumption that matters

If the $35,000 estimate accidentally includes items already on a separate schedule, it overstates the incremental result. Correct the asset register before using the calculation; participation and personal-use facts also remain separate review questions.

What the example leaves for review

The preparer must establish the depreciation difference, when deductions can be used, the relevant marginal rates, state treatment, later-year depreciation and sale consequences. This example does not calculate bonus eligibility or assign asset lives. Use the fee-benefit tool to substitute adviser-supported inputs, then retain the complete multi-year analysis before commissioning the work.

Continue with your property decision